In Praise of Folly: Rantings of a Right Brain Activist
Posted by Jack Cuffari in Smacks on June 29th, 2010
(This originally appeared as a guest blog in the dynamic Duets Blog on April 13, 2010)
I know – a catchy title for a blog, eh? It’s actually the title of a treatise by Erasmus of Rotterdam, and no, he wasn’t the Wharton grad behind the recent boom in Netherlands-based financing. Sounds like it can’t possibly have anything to do with business, after all business doesn’t appreciate folly, which by definition is:
1 : lack of good sense or normal prudence and foresight
2 a : criminally or tragically foolish actions or conduct b obsolete : evil, wickedness; especially : lewd behavior
3 : a foolish act or idea
4 : an excessively costly or unprofitable undertaking
From the Middle English folie, from Anglo-French, from fol fool.
If I was indeed praising folly, definitions 1, 3 and 4 would be red flags for those readers who come to this esteemed blog seeking tips that will ultimately make them more successful business people. Right? Isn’t that your goal, at least from 9 to 5 or whatever workaday parameters your particular career may dictate? Because if it isn’t business information-driven, it’s entertainment or some esoteric thing, and dude, there are only so many hours in a day.
Well, as Einstein said, you have all the time that there is. But then again, he never read Drucker. And what I intend to discuss, or at least rant about, is not truly folly. It may very well be treated as folly by many in the business and attendant financial communities, but it’s not truly folly. Its value may often be neglected by the majority of marketers (although never the big dogs), but it is not actually folly per se.
It is the acknowledgment that between the light-speed rapidity of technological advancement and the analytical, logic-driven business school culture of the Information Age, an unhealthy and profoundly limiting paradigm has now become dangerously obsolete, but is still being worshipped: I call it the Left Brain Only model.
In the Left Brain Only business world, all that matters are analytics, number crunching, logic systems and hard data.
LET’S GET SOFT
In this world, values like empathy, meaning, harmony, narrative, fun, beauty are considered “soft”, unmeasurable, not relevant to bottom line ROI reality, harrumph, harrumph, etc. They’re foofoo dust. Even using those words in many business meetings is considered foolhardy – folly! These words represent the Right Brain attributes that make bean counters, process-based thinkers and B-school babies crazy. Especially in times of economic austerity, intangibles and abstracts get sent to the basement.
Unfortunately, the Left Brain Only model is dead. The trouble is that, as I said earlier, it is profoundly limited, and never so much as it is in today’s post-Information Age age. Because as a society we are searching past information for meaning. And I for one, as a Right Brain guy and a champion of breakthrough, connective messaging, couldn’t be more excited.
The good news for the Old School is that there is and will always be a definite need for all the hard data, analysis and logic systems. You simply can’t run a business without them. But the benefits of engaging Right Brain thinking to complement and complete the existing Left Brain-based model are so extraordinarily powerful and far-reaching that upon consideration it becomes evident that for a company, a brand, a consumer relationship to be complete, to be whole – and holistic – both hemispheres of the brain need to be fully involved in the process of delivery to market.
ESPECIALLY IN BRANDING
This is especially crucial in branding, and it is high time for those of us in branding-based disciplines to remember that what drives successful branding is emotional connectivity, a very human thing. We must effectively engage all the juicy stuff: Jungian thought, right-brain thinking, free-form creative play, and tribal value assessment to do our work. In fact, given the emotional drivers and condition of today’s consumer, your brand will not succeed without intentional, deliberate and meaningful emotional connectivity – and that requires Right Brain activation at every level.
Serious marketers, whether as big as Nike or Merck or as small as a regional manufacturer, understand that just as you can’t run a business without measurement, ROI and logic systems, you can’t go to market without strong consumer/customer connection potential. It takes homework: understanding both your audience’s needs and emotional drivers and the actual core values that represent what your brand stands for – and that is some soft stuff right there.
Here are some questions to ponder: what is Macy’s ROI for their Thanksgiving Day Parade, held annually since 1924? How can Coca-Cola’s brand equity be held at $22 billion? Why is brand equity, which can only be measured in the least scientific of equations, on company balance sheets in most global financial markets?
Or, as Daniel Pink points out in his wonderful book “A Whole New Mind: Why Right-Brainers Will Rule the Future”, in an America where light bulbs are cheap and electricity is ubiquitous, why are candles a $2.4 billion-a-year business?
Here are some more nuggets from his book:
“The paradox of prosperity is that while living standards have risen steadily decade after decade, personal, family and life satisfaction haven’t budged. That’s why more people – liberated by prosperity but not fulfilled by it – are resolving the paradox by searching for meaning. As Columbia University’s Andrew Delbanco puts it, ‘The most striking feature of contemporary culture is the unslaked craving for transcendence.’” (Love the word “unslaked”.)
“For businesses, it’s no longer enough to create a product that’s reasonably priced and adequately functional. It must also be beautiful, unique, and meaningful, abiding what author Virginia Postrel calls ‘the aesthetic imperative.’”
His point is not that Right Brain is better than Left Brain – that attitude is outdated in the eyes of current medical and scientific thinking: “The left converges on a single answer; the right diverges into a Gestalt. The left focuses on categories, the right on relationships. The left can grasp the details. But only the right hemisphere can see the big picture.” Left is analysis, right is synthesis. I don’t know about you, but I’d want my business or the brands I engage to have both, to be capable of accessing, manifesting and expressing both. I want a car with great lines, sleek interior, gorgeous color and interior fabrics and textures. But I also know I’ll need a motor that’s been engineered to a fault.
This is all relevant on multiple levels: by viewing both hemispherical sides of human mind potential we’re talking about a better mode of management, an improved approach to organizational culture, the creation of more potent expressions of brands, enduring relationships with consumers, and a new way to maximize our potential as human individuals.
TRANSCENDENCE: THE MEANING OF MEANING
Let’s get back for a minute to the candle thing. Every room in every building in America has electricity. What’s with all the candles?
It’s because we all seek transcendence, deeper meaning, a more profound value. It’s not enough to collect stuff: a car for every human in the house and multiple large screen TV’s on every floor only go so far, especially in a world where life is hardly seen as sacred. It’s what hippies were saying in the late 60’s: materialism is emptiness. Ask any Park Avenue therapist if that resonates. It’s the undercurrent of a new ethos so popular that there is an entire Western sub-culture of bookstore Buddhists.
WHY SHOULD YOU CARE?
On a practical business level here’s what that means to you as a marketer: because consumers are more informed than ever, highly connected to one another and aggressively proactive, they require more than window dressing from the brands they engage – they want a relationship that promises life-altering or life-improving brand experiences, and they know the difference between a brand that actually provides a meaningful, relevant platform from which to live their lives and a tent show hustle.
They want meaning. They want to know what values your brand stands for, what you know about their lives and the values and needs that drive them. They need to know that you get it. And they can smell phony a mile away.
To accomplish connectivity at this kind of vital level takes great, powerful narrative, an authentic amount of empathy and a degree of meaningfulness that simple data, technology and science can’t deliver alone. And getting to that place may require fun, a focus on aesthetics and altruism – all those soft, non-ROI-based values. And woe to the business that deludes itself into thinking that it can thrive in an optimum manner without fully engaging these attributes.
KNOWLEDGE VS WISDOM
Having worked extensively in healthcare and pharmaceutical marketing and branding, I like to use the caduceus as an example – you know, the two snakes entwined around the staff of Mercury (another discussion there). One snake represents Wisdom, the other, Knowledge. Knowledge = science, information, data, facts, etc. This Left Brain space is where, like B schools, modern medicine has gotten stuck for the past 100 years – especially the past 25 or so with the amazing advances in modern medicine. But look at what is embodied in the other snake, Wisdom: intuition, experience, instinct, empathy – the country doc making a house call and visiting the bedrooms, the privy, the kitchen, getting a sense of the entire, holistic condition of the patient’s life. Right Brain!
Healthcare marketing gets drunk on the science, believing (as many timid communication pros do) that since we’re discussing science we must not evoke magic. Let’s face it, as a culture we idolize doctors and watch medi-dramas on TV not because Doctor Smith understands a certain drug binds to a certain receptor site in the brain. We dig it because one human being is healing another, and that’s magic. An ancient fascination: it’s why the medicine man gets the second best hut in the village. A tremendous opportunity gets lost because communication doesn’t address the physician as the archetype she embodies, the Healer. Most advertising in this category is profoundly see-say, void of Right Brain-resonating metaphor, lost in tedious-for-communication Left Brain literalism. Ever wonder why so it is seldom that pharmaceutical advertising has impact? Well, how thrilling was biology class?
BALANCE IT OUT
We can assume that Left Brain thinking is already present in just about every business, and therefore behind every brand. But businesses that limit their vision and reality to left brain platforms of logic systems, metrics and science will miss out on the right brain attributes of meaning, empathy, harmony, connectivity, and wisdom. Successful businesses understand that their audiences (as groups of humans) seek transcendence and meaning and will therefore imbue their brands with Right Brain-based values that are relevant, full of meaning, carried with powerful narrative connectivity – clearly understood, consistently expressed, and able to transform lives. They will focus on the counterintuitive objective of transcending mere profitability, or risk missing the great societal awakening to transcendence.
This will take a degree of trust, I imagine, much like social media, which requires abdicating command and control to consumers in exchange for instant feedback, assured access and connectivity, and true two way communication. And like social media at its best, embracing the powerful big picture potential of Right Brain activation to complement Left Brain analytical thinking will provide rich, long term rewards.
FOREBRANDING™: The Role of Internal Congruence and Culture
Posted by Jack Cuffari in Smacks on May 18th, 2010
Originally posted on Duets Blog (http://www.duetsblog.com/)
It’s a dilemma: the economy is in the toilet, panic sets in, and long–range planning gives way to short-term thinking. It’s completely rational and logical, of course, and that just makes it worse. Now managers who should really know better are merely looking to the end of the quarter – or next quarter at best – and holding their breath instead of keeping their eyes on the big picture. Truth is no one upstairs wants them to look at the big picture right now – they just want company in their crowded Chicken Little suites.
Despite the vagaries of economic conditions new brands will always require sturdy foundations of rigorous, disciplined construction, and that takes time and money. To develop and launch a healthy, connective and authentic brand considerable groundwork must be done in advance; what any branding expert worth their salt considers due diligence. I call it Forebranding™ – all the work that is done before that brand’s identity is manifested in visual and verbal identity.
A brand can be dumped into the marketplace with a casually developed visual and verbal identity wrapped around it. But if that identity isn’t based upon a relevant, authentic personality and truly reflective of the corporate culture behind it, consumers will ultimately smell a phony and not connect or remain connected.
WHY FOCUS ON CULTURE?
Consumers today are so highly and thoroughly connected and informed that a brand identity that doesn’t: (a) authentically reflect the values of the culture behind it, and (b) respond to consumer’s perceived needs and emotional drivers will not build lasting, long-term (i.e. profitable) relationships with its target audience. In other words, without investing in the work to determine those crucial elements, branding efforts are merely penny-wise and pound-foolish.
Think of it this way: THE BRAND expresses THE CULTURE which expresses THE MISSION which expresses THE VISION which addresses THE NEEDS of a target audience or THE OPPORTUNITIES of the marketplace.
That means there needs to be a considerable effort to achieve Internal Congruence. And that means making sure that your organization’s culture is coherent and clear before communication and brand strategies are developed. Done properly, this results in that elusive and rare creature, successful internal branding.
WHY IS THIS VALUABLE?
This is of tremendous value because internal branding reflects a congruent culture, which in turn reflects a healthy, authentic brand, and healthy brands communicate more potently and more efficiently.
Since every organization has a unique, definite culture, it makes good sense to see what it would take to minimize the lack of congruence in a culture and then develop internal brand identity and messaging. At the very least, understanding and acknowledging the ways in which a culture is dysfunctional allows for compensation and honesty in communication and brand messaging.
It could be said that enduring brand/audience relationships begin with internal communications based in a healthy brand culture. Besides, doing Forebranding work helps assure that from the board to the trenches, everyone has a clear view and understanding of the brand’s vision and mission:
Everyone experiences the vision.
Everyone utilizes the same language.
Everyone has the same clear goals.
Every person is engaged and connected.
All messaging becomes consistent.
Imagine how effective and powerful brand messaging can be when it is founded on the two true pillars of sound branding: A Clear & Authentic Identity, and A Specific & Unique Point of Differentiation, and comes in loud and clear from a position of coherent internal branding.
REALITY CHECK
I know that plenty of my colleagues are going to say what they’ve been saying to me for about a year now – “This is too esoteric. Just give ‘em their logo and a tagline, be happy for the work and be done with it.”
And in all honesty, most marketers don’t want to be bothered with vision and mission work, having suffered through ineffective and laborious versions of the process. Often they’d rather not have anyone worrying about optimizing opportunity for the long term when they can launch and make money needed today by winging it. A rare enlightened marketer may see the benefits of Internal Congruence clearly enough to invest in the process. I’ve found that the general reality lies somewhere in the middle. I’ve painted what I consider to be a perfect scenario. But, as Winston Churchill said “If you want ‘perfection’ you must spell it ‘paralysis’.”
My advice: as you enter the branding process, see how much of this early, foundational internal work you can include. You will undoubtedly have to compromise, but the more you accomplish, the stronger and more sturdy the brand identity will be and the more likely chance your brand will have to build durable relationships with consumers. And here’s a side benefit: because Forebranding results in more efficient messaging and a greater degree of clarity, you will have protected the client’s investment of resources along the way.
Oh Mickey, you apparently aren’t so fine: Rebranding the Mouse?
Posted by Jack Cuffari in Check It Out on November 6th, 2009
Here’s a piece from our friends at brandchannel: it seems Disney is about to “rebrand” Mickey Mouse. Although the word really ought to be “re-imagine” – they’re talking about showing the “darker side” of the iconic, true American idol.
This sounds like trying to show the up side of down. The Mouse has always been a symbol of the now lamented American can-do attitude: positive, compassionate, light-hearted, inspiring, energetic, fearless.
This move comes in the wake of Disney finally acknowledging that Mickey’s popularity has “begun to wane” in the U.S. Hello!?!
For years there were no new MM cartoons -there were at least 15 to 20 years between releases. Nineteen forty-seven’s “Mickey and the Beanstalk” was the last time Walt himself played Mickey. It was years before another feature was released.
During those years there was no shortage of MM merch, Disneyland/world revenue, etc. A friend of mine who worked with Disney on the music side told me that insiders called this on-going milking of an absent icon “raping the mouse.”
There’s a lot going on here: an obvious commentary on how marketers view American values today, a brand that was ignored for decades, not refreshed or re-launched, a coporate culture casting about for a touchstone and a new vision, and ultimately what looks like re-invention of a unique, international and intergenerational brand.
But when a brand embodies such a clear set of values and personality traits, does a drastic alteration even make sense? Branding intelligence would caution against twisting the perception of a brand so well embedded as to be almost be archetypal. What’s next, Donald Duck as a serene Buddhist monk?
Check it out, check it out, check it out – and weigh in on the brandchannel site:
http://www.brandchannel.com/home/post/2009/11/05/Disney-To-Rebrand-Mickey-Mouse.aspx
No longer able to handle being teased…
Posted by Jack Cuffari in Check It Out on August 7th, 2009
Is this a telling symptom of a new, terminal disease: the inability to wait a friggin’ minute? It used to be that launching a teaser campaign piqued people’s interest, and they waited and speculated and were even somewhat eager for the teasing marketer’s news.
Now? It’s considered rude to not provide all information immediately, because if I’m bothering to remove my laser focus from my incredibly urgent and all-consuming Twitter and BlackBerry bulletins, it had better be worth my while.
It’s beyond instant gratification – more like we’re turning into toddlers with the attention span of gnats.
Check it out, check it out, check it out:http://adage.com/adages/post?article_id=138346
Buzz Analysis: Twitter metrics way deeper than your average tweet.
Posted by Jack Cuffari in Check It Out on June 24th, 2009
Twitter blows my mind: the only news source from Iran’s streets, true, but most of what buzzes my phone is inane chatter or shameless self-promotion. And then, every marketer’s dream to balance it out: very cool in-depth metrics and profiling tools: Tweet Sentiment, Twitter Search, Tweet Me, TweetBeep and now TweetPsych, which uses linguistic inquiry and word count as well as a Regressive Imagery Dictionary to psychologically profile a person based on their tweets’ content.
I really want to know which of these tickles your inner planner. But first – Tweet Pysch – check it out, check it out, check it out: http://tweetpsych.com/
Store brands take name brands to school.
Posted by Jack Cuffari in Check It Out on June 15th, 2009
Someone’s been sleeping at the wheel. We know that all too many brands snooze when it comes to building consumer relationships; once they’ve established an identity and been accepted in a perceived niche, they get lazy and just go through the motions of advertising, promoting, and letting their message get stale.
When consumers don’t have a dynamic, meaningful reason to engage a brand, they’ll abandon it for other good reasons -like good old fashioned economics.
Why should brands stay proactive in managing how they’re perceived in the marketplace? A recent study shows that 91% – 91%, yo – of consumers say that they’ll stick with store brands when the recession eases. Wait a minute – what happened to brand loyalty? Oh, yeah – it has to be earned. Seems that store brands have that part figured out – they’ve made a promise that they are obviously delivering: “We’re close enough to those more expensive brands that haven’t told you why they should matter.” Check it out, check it out, check it out:
91% of Shoppers Will Keep Buying Store Brands After Recession Ends
Brand Smack: Your brand as a religion.
Posted by Jack Cuffari in Smacks on June 8th, 2009
Think of your brand in terms of a belief system – a religion if you will. Once we acknowledge that each brand has specific core values that should function as behavioral touchstones, we can see that there are things that brand must do and say and things that it should not do or say.
This approach helps codify the brand’s personality traits and resultant behavior. And that, in turn, will help evolve the thinking and understanding of those stakeholders who still think a brand is a logo and a tagline. (Yeah, they still exist – even at the most sophisticated marketers.) More importantly, it will assure consistency and authenticity in messaging and expression in the marketplace – helping consumers connect with values that reflect their own, thereby enhancing the platforms from which they engage the world and define and express themselves .
Religions are human constructs, so they require rules and regulations – if for no other reason to provide direction and order so believers have access and points of connection. And your brand wants consumers to have access and points of connectivity as well. Think of your brand as having its dogma: what it stands for, what it means, what its values are. This should be clear and unchanging, and written down as if in concrete. Conversely this means that there is a brand heresy: those words and phrases and behaviors that your brand will never express under any circumstances because they would indicate an abdication of those “sacred” core values.
Let’s face it: we say we want consumers to be in relationship with our brand, but secretely or not so seceretly we’d love to have them put the brand on a pedestal even as we would have them engage the brand and integrate it into their lives.
I’m not saying build a golden calf. I’m merely pointing out that the core values of a brand are sacred precisely because they are manifestations of integrity and meaning, and that using a matrix of dogma (what the brand believes and does) and heresy (what the brand does not believe and will never do) can be an effective tool and touchstone in developing a fully dimensional and realized brand identity.
Don, the King of the Street Shine
Posted by Jack Cuffari in Check It Out on May 28th, 2009
When I was working for inVentiv, I became addicted to having my shoes shined by Don Ward. This guy is amazing: great at his work, and with an infectious sales patter that is completely effective! When in town I make it a point to get to 47th and 6th – and so should you. Check it out, check it out, check it out: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=06TTiOkwuDs
Brand Smack: Get up, stand up! Brands need two legs.
Posted by Jack Cuffari in Smacks on May 28th, 2009
There are two essential legs that any brand requires to be able to stand up, play and thrive in the arena of consumer engagement.
A Clear & Authentic Identity
By “clear” I mean an intentional and fully fleshed-out personality that is consistent, meaningful and based upon the realities of the marketplace. And by “Authentic” I mean that the brand’s identity (visual, verbal, behavioral) should accurately reflect the values of the organizational culture behind it. Consumers are well-informed, connected in every conceivable direction and highly motivated by economic realities to sniff out any disconnects between who you are and what your brand says it is. This only makes sense as consumers want to engage brands that both reflect their values and provide them with a platform from which to live their lives.
A Specific & Unique Point of Differentiation
Well, duh. But here I want to emphasize the word “Specific”. As branding smarties we should be able to determine a unique POD for every one of two hundred Italian restaurants within the same county, because we are supposed to have done our homework. I refer to this work as Forebranding, and much of it has to do with internal branding and looking at your culture. Because ultimately your brand is an expression and reflection of your culture, and every culture is completely unique. Once you truly know who you are – glory, warts and all – you’ll be halfway to an ownable Point Of Differentiation.
The other half? All the external stuff: market dynamics, competitive analysis, consumer needs reporting, etc. More about that soon!
Chipotle panics, pisses off brand loyalists.
Posted by Jack Cuffari in Check It Out on May 26th, 2009
OK, so we all know that times are hard, consumers are broke, agencies aren’t getting paid, whine, whine whine. And no one denies that marketers can change the messaging and fine tune the brand’s image to their heart’s content. Hey – it’s their brand. Brands are supposed to evolve, right? They have life cycles, right?
But what happened to Chipotle is a just a stone drag. They’ve abandoned the attitudinal stance and humorous messaging that launched and sustained them and instead gone the whole Chicken Little conservative route. (That’s worked so very well for everything else in our lives, hasn’t it?) They’ve created a generic, boring logo, gone the way of TB menu-wise, staked a claim in the current terrified austerity worldview, and pushed clever out the door for empathetic – think Terri Garr’s character’s tuna pitch in “Mr. Mom”. So sad.
Chipotle started out in Denver, and its hard core brand champs are from that neck o’ the woods. So it’s only right and proper that they get their comeuppance bashing by the one and only Denver Egotist. Check it out, check it out, check it out:
http://thedenveregotist.com/editorial/4103/chipotles-new-advertising-gives-us-indigestion-part-one